Tales of sheep and wolves deemed ‘brainwashing’ close to pro-democracy protests
HONG KONG: 5 Hong Kong speech therapists had been sentenced on Saturday to 19 months in jail for conspiracy to publish seditious youngsters’s books, that includes cartoons of sheep and wolves that prosecutors had deemed anti-government.
The 5 had been convicted on Wednesday underneath a colonial-era sedition legislation in a case denounced by rights campaigners as a “brazen act of repression”, which the Hong Kong authorities has rejected.
The defendants, who had pleaded not responsible, had been accused of publishing three books that includes cartoons of sheep combating towards wolves.
District Courtroom Choose Kwok Wai Kin stated the defendants needed to be punished “not due to the publication or the phrases however due to their hurt or the danger of hurt to the minds of kids”, saying the works sowed seeds of “instability”.
“What the defendants have executed to the kids aged 4 and above was in truth a brainwashing train with a view to guiding the very younger youngsters to simply accept their views and values,” Kwok stated.
Lorie Lai, Melody Yeung, Sidney Ng, Samuel Chan and Marco Fong, aged 26 to 29, had been convicted by Kwok, who was handpicked by town’s chief to strive nationwide safety instances.
The books referred to occasions together with town’s mass pro-democracy protests in 2019 and the case of 12 democracy protesters who fled Hong Kong by speedboat in 2020 and had been captured by the Chinese language coastguard.
In a single e book, wolves need to occupy a village and eat the sheep, who in flip begin to struggle again.
It’s the first time a seditious publications case has gone to trial for the reason that 2019 protests and the imposition of a nationwide safety legislation on Hong Kong by Beijing in 2020, which officers stated was important to revive stability.
One the group’s legal professionals estimated that the 5 could possibly be out in 31 days as soon as deductions had been made, together with the 13 months they spent in jail awaiting trial.
Acknowledging they might quickly depart jail, Choose Kwok requested the 5 “once you would go away the jail of your personal thoughts”.
Lai’s mitigation was interrupted by Kwok, who stated “the court docket just isn’t a spot to make political speech”.
“Everybody has the liberty of expression, however that doesn’t equal absolute freedom,” he stated.
Earlier than being stopped, Lai had stated the core problem of the trial was freedom of speech and “freedom with limitations just isn’t freedom”.
Defendant Yeung quoted the American civil rights chief Martin Luther King saying “a riot is the language of the unheard”.
“I don’t remorse my alternative, and I hope I can at all times stand on the facet of the sheep,” Yeung stated.
Choose Kwok stated in his verdict that “youngsters will likely be led into the idea that the PRC Authorities is coming to Hong Kong with the depraved intention of taking away their house and ruining their joyful life with no proper to take action in any respect”, referring to the Folks’s Republic of China.
The defendants had been members of the Basic Union of Hong Kong Speech Therapists, which Choose Kwok stated “was clearly arrange for political functions”.
“The political state of affairs seems to be calm on the floor however very unstable beneath,” Kwok stated, describing the state of affairs in Hong Kong after the nationwide safety legislation.